Neyman
Here we focus on the average causal effect size. Fisher was a smoke test: “Is anything there?” This is a “How much is there?”
The Null Hypothesis here is “The average effect is zero.” Let’s use SACE. The null here is:
Remember that this is a God Mode claim. We cannot observe both potential outcomes (the Fundamental Problem of Causal Inference) and have to deal with that. We do this by putting a hat on SACE, the estimand, and estimating it as , the estimator. A number will pop out. It is the estimate.
Again, this is the same setup as before. You are answering two different questions.
Say you have 20 people
| Alice | Ben | Carol | David | Treated mean | Control mean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caffeine (8) | Caffeine (7) | Nap (5) | Nap (3) | 7.5 | 4.0 | +3.5 |
| 2 | Caffeine (8) | Nap (6) | Caffeine (5) | Nap (3) | 6.5 | 4.5 | +2.0 |
| 3 | Caffeine (8) | Nap (6) | Nap (5) | Caffeine (4) | 6.0 | 5.5 | +0.5 |
| 4 | Nap (6) | Caffeine (7) | Caffeine (5) | Nap (3) | 6.0 | 4.5 | +1.5 |
| 5 | Nap (6) | Caffeine (7) | Nap (5) | Caffeine (4) | 5.5 | 5.5 | 0.0 |
| 6 | Nap (6) | Nap (6) | Caffeine (5) | Caffeine (4) | 4.5 | 6.0 | −1.5 |
| Avg | +1.0 |