Skip to main content

Sep 15 - EHR Audit Logs

by Thomas Kannampallil, WUSTL Medicine.

This is what a deidentified EHR Audit Log looks like. It's a table of events. A clinican can generate a 1,000 of these events a day.

ACCESS_TIMEUSER_IDPAT_IDMETRIC_NAME
12/21/19 7:21M58530Inpatient Patient Lists list loaded
12/21/19 7:21M58530Inpatient system list accessed
12/21/19 7:21M58530AStoryboard viewed
12/21/19 7:21M58530ASmartSets activity selected
12/21/19 7:21M58530AVisit Navigator template loaded
12/21/19 7:21M58530AProblem List accessed
12/21/19 7:21M58530AChart Review Encounters tab selected
12/21/19 7:21M58530AChart Review Notes tab selected
12/21/19 7:21M58530AChart Review Note report viewed
12/21/19 7:22M58530AReport with patient data viewed
12/21/19 7:23M58530ANotes viewed
12/21/19 7:23M58530AVisit Navigator template loaded
12/21/19 7:25M58530AIn Basket message created
12/21/19 7:25M58530APend clinical note

A very early paper on clinical log analysis was done in 2003 by students in the department.

You can certainly use these logs to get a lot of information but they can have severe limitations and it depends a lot on the problem you're trying to solve. In the speaker's example, they were trying to predict burnout in clinicians and used survey scores which had AUROC scores of 0.8+ compared to 'typical' models like Random Forest, etc that lingered around 0.5. Even deep learning approaches did not work as well. Theirs were a very complex problem. Might require causal modeling.

"APPs" → Advance-Practice Providers. "Physician assistants, nurse practitioners, nurse anesthetists, nurse midwives and clinical nurse specialists all fall under the category of APPs [#]".

In a lovely irony, the increase in the use of (secure) messaging with all its blessings (async, 'efficient') didn't really help with burnout or the amount of time clinicians spent on the phone actually talking to each other; it increased! Speaker notes that this is associative and not causative.

Grand Challenges with this kind of informatics

  1. Large-scale multicenter studies. Regulatory issues around large-scale data sharing.
  2. Need for data models and standards.
  3. Building standard data pipelines.
  4. Adapting behavioral theories from cognitive sciences. Action-as-a-language framework and the use of LLMs. Measure for clinician behaviors.

TODO: Review Prospective versus Retrospective studies.

TODO: Get a 10,000ft overview of Large Action Models.

TODO: You've never done a Mixed-Effects Regression Model before.